Comments on: Guild Wars 2 – Confirmed and Explained

By: j

Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:52:34 +0000

your all dorks age should stop taking this so seriously!

By: Simon Armidilo

Simon Armidilo — Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:19:07 +0000

The campaigns weren’t completely different they brought new pvp styles like factions did with the alliance battles and nightfall with hero battles and overall its a new world.

By: bigwig

bigwig — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 08:51:42 +0000

I’m actually happy to see the campaigns go. They were just too similar to each other, even when they tried to reinvent guild wars (the changes were superficial each time around) in each campaign. A more open world definetly sounds like the right approach as well.

By: Bizak

Bizak — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 07:51:39 +0000

What!? Deer Sir! How dare thy mention witchcraft of RuneScape!

No really, game that uses poorest graphics possible and costs 5$ a month to play will cost more then Prophecies after 4-5 months of membership. Unless off course you stay on f2p and die painful death of utter boredom.

By: Michael

Michael — Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:57:40 +0000

I would agree, I think the concept of ’sequels’ for MMOGs is generally a bad idea.

What do you mean, though, when you say ‘Change the name’? You don’t think Guild Wars is descriptive enough? :)

By: Abalieno

Abalieno — Wed, 21 Mar 2007 23:50:59 +0000

I despise MMO sequel, but do at least ONE thing: change the name.